Showing posts with label spies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spies. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

The Eagle Has Landed

Dutch police are adopting the centuries-old pursuit of falconry to deal with the modern-day danger of drones.
They're the world's first force to employ eagles to take down illegal drones.
Dutch police spokesman Dennis Janus: "The eagles see the drones as prey and intercept them as they are flying. Then they land with the drone still in their claws."
These feathered enforcement tools will now be deployed whenever drones are believed to be posing a threat to the public or flying close to airports or sensitive areas. They will be active in time for next summer in the Netherlands.
Oh, and by the way, none of the birds was hurt during testing... however not one of the drones survived!

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Spying on Star Wars

Have you seen the new Star Wars film yet?
If so, did you spot 007, Daniel Craig???!!!
It was revealed late last year that Daniel Craig had nabbed a cameo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens (true!). But few realised the James Bond actor features in a prominent moment, in which he speaks four lines. The scriptwriters even named his Stormtrooper JB-007, in a nod to his role as super-sleuth Bond.
Daniel appears in a short scene opposite Daisy Ridley's character Rey, who mind-controls Stormtrooper JB-007 before they become involved in a brief humorous exchange.
The next 007...???
This wee part came about simply from being in the right place at the right time. Craig had been filming Spectre at Pinewood studios in Buckinghamshire, when he got talking to Star Wars director J.J. Abrams, who also shot some of his film at the same complex: they concocted the cameo together.
So, if you haven't seen the movie yet, keep your eyes peeled - and may the Force be with you!

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Game Of Drones

I spy! Here's one, hovering over
my place last weekend...! WHY??
The military use them.
Commercial opportunites abound.
They're the new toy-of-choice.
And they open up a minefield of legal questions...
Technically known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS), drones are becoming more and more common. But this has triggered fears about their impact on privacy and aviation safety.
NZ's Privacy Act is a technology-neutral piece of legislation, by which the Privacy Commissioner assesses privacy implications of an emerging technology. While drones are a new technology, the threat they pose to privacy is consistent with the use of any camera, including mobile phones or automated CCTV systems. So the Commission's CCTV guidelines apply to how someone might use drones fitted with cameras and comply with the Privacy Act.
The main points for any camera operator to observe are:
  • be clear about why you're collecting information/footage;
  • make sure people know you're collecting it/how you intend to use it;
  • keep the information safe/make sure only authorised people see it;
  • dispose of the information after it's served its purpose;
  • right of access to the information by individuals concerned.
There are also other NZ laws relevant to using drones to film/record. EG: it's against the law to make covert intimate recordings of people without their consent/knowledge, and to publish them. So, if you're sunbathing in your fenced backyard, you'd rightly expect that you won't be spied on.
There's also the possibility the homeowner might want to take their own court action against a camera operator for invasion of privacy.
It is also against the law to peer into homes and record any activity within.
The Privacy Commissioner says it's important to keep the drone issue in perspective. People using drones should have the same consideration for others, as those who already use CCTV cameras on their properties or dash cams in their cars.
That's because the laws that protect people's privacy have been there for some time. While the technology of visual recording keeps changing, the laws and principles around the collecting/disclosing of information remain as relevant as ever.

UPDATE: 24 June 2015 – Rogue drone crashes onto Christchurch restaurant roof.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Huawei: The Enemy Within?

The NZ Govt knows best.
It's flicking off renewed concerns about Chinese telco Huawei (which is happily operating here, while being accused of espionage in USA).
New security worries have surfaced, following a US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee report which advises telecommunications operators not to do business with Huawei, because of potential Chinese state influence on the companies. The committee cited long-term security risks linked with the companies' equipment and services.
Acting NZ Communications Minister Steven Joyce says the US has long been concerned about Huawei, but our security agencies have already screened it: "Different countries take a different view on the risks to their security at different times. That's an example of where our sovereignty is very different to the US."
US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers says companies using Huawei equipment had reported "numerous allegations" of unexpected behaviour, including routers supposedly sending large data packs to China late at night.
Opposition parties and technology experts says our govt should follow the lead of the UK, US, and Oz and stop Huawei operating here. Labour's even calling for a full inquiry.
But no, the NZ Govt knows best.
It knows far more than the global heavyweights. It's certain, now that we've given Huawei hundreds of millions to roll out our broadband, that they will be our friends. And friends would not ever spy on us. Surely...?
Huawei has an office in Auckland, and over the past two years supplied equipment for the ultra-fast broadband roll out.
Strategic Analyst Paul Buchanan reckons our govt has ignored international security concerns regarding Huawei: "This points again to a cavalier attitude of the government to issues of intelligence and security." Cavalier? Try, naivety. Ignorance. Blind stupidity. Irresponsibility. But hey, the NZ Govt knows best.
[See also my posting from April 2012...]

Friday, June 1, 2012

Better Than A Nuke

Thousands of Iranian govt computers have been hit by a highly sophisticated virus.
Wall Street Journal says Flame was widespread through the Middle East and other parts of the world, but Iran was affected the most. It's at least the third time since 2010 Iran's been hit by hi-tech viruses (such as Stuxnet, Duqu and Wiper), disabling enrichment centrifuges, stealing data from nuke facilities and erasing oil ministry computers.
Experts at computer security firm Kaspersky say the aim of Flame was espionage, not damage or interruption. Flame was still active last Monday, but after Kaspersky went public, it immediately started shutting down to hide its source. By Tuesday, it was inactive.
Kaspersky said at least 20 specialists were needed to create/maintain Flame, suggesting it was sponsored by a nation-state: it wasn't economically feasible for a private corporation to run such a large-scale international cyberattack.
Flame is the biggest and most high-functioning cyberweapon ever discovered, 20X larger than Stuxnet and with 100X more code than a basic virus. Experts believe it fed back info to a central control network that constantly changed location. Analysts found servers around the world, but hadn't located the main server.
Iran said on Tuesday it was a victim of cyberwarfare by Israel and the US. The White House declined to comment. Israel neither confirmed nor denied, but an Iranian news site claims otherwise...
It's like a plot from a techno-spy thriller! Still, disrupting Iran's uranium enrichment programme by cyber-attack has gotta be better than Israel's option of choice, a pre-emptive military strike.
PS: 01 June 2012 - NY Times says US and Israel were responsible for Stuxnet virus in 2010.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

US Military In North Korea?

US military resources are in Nth.Korea.
No, we're not. Yes, you are.
No, we're not. Yes, you SAID so.
Errrr, we were speaking hypothetically.
Tokyo-based online international affairs mag The Diplomat reported this week that US Army Brig.Gen.Neil Tolley (US special forces boss in Sth.Korea) said US troops have secretly parachuted into Nth.Korea (DPRK) on spy missions with Sth.Korean soldiers.
The proverbial must have hit the Pentagon fan, coz the next day The Diplomat wrote: "While the author strongly disputes the contention that any quote was fabricated, we acknowledge the possibility that Brig.Gen.Tolley was speaking hypothetically, about future war plans rather than current operations. The author insists he heard no such qualification, but if there has been a misunderstanding then we regret any confusion."
On his own blog, the journo David Axe wrote: "The Diplomat has yanked my 'Commandos In Nth.Korea' story, under pressure from those who claim I made up Brig.Gen.Tolley’s comments. I did not make them up. Multiple sources confirm Tolley's words. And I'm told no transcript will be made available. US Forces Korea is lying about what happened..."
Army Times reporter Sean Naylor: "I was there....Tolley clearly said ROK and US troops were in DPRK for recon, as Dave reported."
Whatever the truth, it should be no surprise. The Korean War never officially finished. The border is rife with minor skirmishes. The air is filled with vitriolic verbage. Nth.Korea is increasing its military. There's no possibility of recon NOT being undertaken (they'll be doing the same right now in Iran). The fact is, US is very focused on the Korean Peninsula, esp. after DPRK's latest test-launch/crash of a ballistic rocket.
A fortnight ago was twice-yearly Exercise Max Thunder between US and South Korea, the largest Air Combat Command exercise in Korea. Traditionally for fighter planes, less than 2hrs beforehand US added high-altitude B-52 bombers to the mix. Interesting. An exercise liaison officer said: "It’s important to show what we bring to the fight. During an actual war, B-52s would support the fight. So it’s important to exercise those capabilities now."
It must have impressed South Korea. It should have done the same with China, a DPRK supporter. And if it didn't make Kim Jong-Un take notice, then he really is as stupid as his haircut!

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

No Kiwi Cheese For The White Mouse

NZ fails AGAIN!
Another kiwi hero has died, with no acknowledgement or official thanks!
Nancy Wake (one of the most highly decorated Allied secret agents of WWII) died this week in London just before her 99th birthday.
Born in NZ and raised in Australia, she helped hundreds of Allied personnel escape from occupied France. In 1940 Mrs Wake became a French Resistance courier and later a saboteur and spy, setting up escape routes and destroying German installations. The Gestapo named her the "White Mouse" because she was so elusive and, at one point, she was top of their most wanted list.
She was Australia's most decorated servicewoman; France awarded her its highest honour, the Legion D'Honneur; she also received Britain's George Medal, and the US Medal of Freedom. In 2004, she was made Companion of the Order of Australia. [She was also the inspiration for the book and the film Charlotte Gray.]
All her life, she maintained she would always be a NZer. How ironic then, that she has never been formally honoured by the very country she was so patriotic about. The BBC even headlined her death with "Australian WWII heroine dies".
Here, war veteran Pat Hickton (who was saved by Nancy Wake) says he's tried for years to have her recognised and recently hand-wrote a four-page letter to PM John Key urging him to take action - nothing happened. He says Veteran Affairs Minister Judith Collins promised that Mrs Wake would be recognised in the Queen's Birthday Honours list last year - nothing happened. Hickton says Nancy Wake deserved the Order of NZ, our highest honour...but, just like with the 60th annvsy of the Battle Of Kap'yong, the Crete veterans, our soldiers with Agent Orange birth defects - nothing.
Her Awards:
* Australia: Companion of the Order of Australia; George Medal
* Commonwealth of Nations: 1939-1945 Star; France and Germany Star and bar
* UK: Defence Medal and bar; War Medal 1939-1945
* France: Legion d'Honneur; Croix de Guerre with two palms and a star; Medaille de la Resistance
* USA: Presidential Medal of Freedom with Bronze Palm
* NZ: Royal NZ Returned and Services' Assn.Badge in Gold.
* But from the NZ Government...nothing. SHAMEFUL!

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

The Mad Dog Gets His Bone!

Wikileaks unveiled 250,000 diplomatic documents last weekend, and what do we find? *Shock!*Horror!*Probe!*
Nothing that'll stop the world turning. No smoking gun. No cat out of the bag. No fox in the hen house. For all the mutterings in the corridors of Langley, the juiciest tit-bits so far (and I use that term intentionally) involve the Mad Dog of Libya, Muammar Qaddafi. Wait, stop the bus: maybe the fox is in the hen house...!
More tea, darlink?
Classified diplomatic cables reveal the 68yr.old Libyan leader actually has good taste! Seems he has a staff of four Ukrainian nurses - including one named Galyna Kolotnytska who's described as a "voluptuous blonde". Galyna is 38, and the only one of the four-gal team that knows Da Boss's routine inside-out. So just how well does she know his routine? Inside-out!
The cables state Qaddafi has female bodyguards rather than males, and say "it's unknown currently why he travels like that". Well, duuuuuuh, think about it!! Voluptuous? Blonde? Able to leap large beds in a single bound? Unt vis an irrrrrrresistable Rrrrrrrussian accent, and a 9mm Makarov tucked in her garter belt!
Galyna Kolotnytska, I cannot see the attraction myself. YEA, RIGHT!
See the attraction?
There's even *gasp* a suggestion that G and G are "doing the wild thang"! Wow, those US diplomats must have very high IQs: I'd never have figured that out! So...just how well does he know her routine? Say all together: inside-out!
Other earthshattering revelations are that Qaddafi loves horse-racing and flamenco dancing. So...? To hell with all that: the man likes blonde voluptuous Ukrainian nurses... inside-out!
Qaddafi, you've just risen in my esteem by mega-points! Go, you Mad Dog, you!

Friday, September 3, 2010

Eye In The Sky

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been around for well over a decade: we're all familiar with the USA's extensive use of drones for both surveillence and attack in the Middle East. You may not be aware that our forces also have this technology, albeit on a much smaller scale.
This is the NZDF miniature UAV (called the "Kahu" - because everything in NZ seems to require a maori name). But with a range of only 25km, two hours' flight time, and a payload of .6kg., it'll never carry any missiles.
They've been operated by my old unit, 1 Locating Troop, 16 Field Regiment, Royal New Zealand Artillery since 2008. They give excellent "over the hill" view to commanders on the ground. And mini-UAVs are often used here by private companies for photography purposes: Google even uses them for street mapping.
With slight modification, they can also be used by the Navy. They have search-and-rescue potential, carrying a thermal-imaging camera to detect the temperature difference of a body in the water. UAVs can cover a larger area faster than a ship, and cheaper than an aircraft. One difficulty with naval use is recovery at sea, but a reliable automatic system will be aboard one of our new patrol ships this year.
So, given the obvious benefits, I was somewhat surprised that a request this week, by our soldiers in Afghanistan, for mini-UAVs has been rejected. NZ Defence Minister Wayne Mapp has asked for an update on the UAVs. He'll want specific logistical information before considering their deployment, given that sending UAVs would also require sending support personnel. The NZDF claims the mini-UAVs are not ready for operational use, but that's bollocks!
Mind you, with a lot of NZers limp-dick about using our forces in the roles they're trained for, the government will be cautious about escalating our involvement...

Friday, August 27, 2010

Sensations Sell Stories!

Danial Craig 007 in Casino RoyaleBritish newspapers are having a field day with the stuff that headlines are made of: the murder of Gareth Williams, an analyst at GCHQ seconded to the UK spy service MI6 (GCHQ eavesdrops on telephone conversations).
Whether he was killed by Islamic extremists, Russian gangsters or someone closer to him, Williams died a spy's death. Killed in his penthouse, his body was found in the bathroom stuffed inside a sports bag. As murders go, it could be from a James Bond film.
If you have spare time, you could wade through this article in the Daily Mail...which touches on every possible angle.
But in his frenzy to add as much 007-like excitement as possible, the journalist has not double-checked his sources. He's assumed if it was published in another source, someone else MUST have checked it, and therefore it must be legit. My eye was caught by this particular quote in the article:
"After the entire electricity grid in Auckland went down in the late 1990s, GCHQ helped the NZ authorities trace the cyber-attack back to a group named the 'Anti-Christ Doom Squad', which had managed this feat from a laptop in an Amsterdam drug café."
The original source for this was Thinking about the Unthinkable: Australian Vulnerabilities to High-Tech Risks, a research paper by Dr Adam Cobb, Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Group, 29 June 1998. This story was fabricated for the Australian research paper as an example of what MIGHT be possible by hi-tech hackers, in the lead-up to the 2000 Sydney Olympics. The researcher even STATED that it was a myth. But now it's being circulated globally as fact...
THIS - "ATTACK" - NEVER - HAPPENED!!!
As we in NZ know, the massive power blackouts were caused by aging equipment failures and maintenance oversights (which were well-researched in the witchhunt that followed).
Daily Mail...you FAIL!
PS: 03 May 2012 - Finally, the coroner's report on Gareth Williams' death. And it's a "No shit, Sherlock"!!!

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

The Sinking Of The Rainbow Warrior: 25 Years On

Back in the 1980s, France was developing nuclear warheads, with regular underground tests at Moruroa Atoll, French Polynesia. The atoll was gradually cracking and leaking radiation into the sea.
NZ was an unofficial leader of the growing global anti-nuclear movement. In July 1985 the Greenpeace flagship Rainbow Warrior was in Auckland, NZ, preparing for a protest mission to Moruroa...but the voyage was not to be.
The French government, wanting to stop Greenpeace's protest, sent a large team of saboteurs to sink the Warrior: "Opération Satanique" was carried out by the 'action' branch of the French foreign intelligence services - the Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE) - late in the evening of July 10, 1985...
The first limpet mine exploded under the engine room, blasting a hole the size of a car. Everyone was ordered off the ship but photographer Fernando Pereira went back to get his precious cameras. There was a second explosion and, caught in a rush of water, Pereira drowned. He had just celebrated his 35th birthday.
The NZ police, reacting swiftly to their first act of terrorism, were soon questioning two high-ranking French agents of the DGSE, while the rest of the team managed to escape – some by yacht and later submarine. France, an ally (!!!) of NZ, initially denied involvement and condemned the "terrorist act", but it was soon obvious they were involved. The French Defence Minister resigned and the head of the DGSE was fired. "Opération Satanique" was a public relations disaster.
Six weeks later, the agents' pre-trial hearing was dramatically shortened by a French threat: an economic embargo of NZ's exports to Europe if the pair was not released. Such an action would have crippled the NZ economy, as it was then so dependent on agricultural exports. In 1986, France agreed to pay NZ$13 million to NZ and apologise: in return the pair would be detained at a French military base on Hao Atoll in French Polynesia. But the two were released in less than two years. As this violated the agreement, the French had to pay further reparations.
In the wake of the bombing, a flotilla of private NZ yachts sailed to Moruroa to protest: French nuclear tests in the Pacific eventually halted. In 1987, under international pressure, the French government paid $8.16 million to Greenpeace.
The failure of NZ's Western allies to condemn what could be considered an act of war by France caused a change in foreign and defence policy. NZ distanced itself from its traditional ally USA, and built relationships with smaller South Pacific nations, while keeping excellent relations with Australia and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom.
No-one else has ever been charged over the bombing and death, although all the team members' identities are known: 20 years later, a French Intelligence report said the attack was authorised by French President François Mitterrand. Justice has never fully been served for Fernando Pereira but his memory continues to inspire those who fight for a cleaner world.
And what happened to the Rainbow Warrior? Two years after the bombing, she reached her final resting place under Matauri Bay, in Northland. Resting at 27m depth, she has become a living reef, attracting marine life and divers: a fitting end for a ship that spent her time protecting the marine environment.
NZer David Robie, aboard the ship that fateful night, wrote Eyes of Fire: The Last Voyage of the Rainbow Warrior in 1986. And you can read an article about that fateful night and the aftermath here.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Google Knows...

Google is now your 'Big Brother' - with all the 1984 connotations!
Google has collected personal internet data from NZ homes, including the names and unique numbers associated with residents' wireless networks...all without their knowledge or consent. How? By multi-tasking its Street View cars...
Street View involved cars travelling the world's streets with 3D cameras, capturing panoramic views to overlay with Google Maps. When that came on-stream, we all thought it was fab... and started googling images of friends' houses everywhere. So, on the one hand, the data is publicly available and being happily used but, on the other hand, consumers never dreamed their wireless points would be used for data snatching.
Google argues that, as the info is public, it's not breaking any laws but concedes the gathering "could have been better publicised". Privacy advocates want assurances that its use will not extend beyond Google Maps: after all, it's only the company's word as a guarantee it's not misusing the data. But despite ten governments (including NZ) requesting details, Google has not issued any explanation. Perhaps its PR department is still drafting a believable answer!
PS: 15 May 2010 - Google's answer..."Opps! Sorry."
PS: 07 June 2010 - "Sorry" isn't good enough! Australia launches a probe into Google's Street View.
PS: 12 July 2010 - Google found guilty by Oz of privacy breaches...

Monday, March 29, 2010

James Bond on Facebook?

007 movie introHaving battled Islamic extremists, Irish Republican terrorists and Russian agents, some veteran spies are being defeated by a foe they cannot master: information technology.
Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, Brosnan, Craig: Bond...James Bond!The fictional James Bond kept up-to-date with the latest gadgets, but older real-life spies have been warned they face redundancy if they fall behind with technology. Britain's MI5 Security Service is launching a round of redundancies to improve the overall level of computer skills among its staff. It is instead hiring new intelligence officers with a better grasp of information technology and other "deployable" skills: 007 on Facebook perhaps?
MI5 is concerned its overall IT skills are not up to scratch, leading to the redundancy of some employees. Only a small proportion will be affected, but redundancies will be across the board and not just with IT specialists.
With a move back towards on-the-ground eyes-and-ears human intelligence-gathering, MI5's current 3,500 officers will grow to 4,100 by next year, double its 2001 size. Many of the new recruits are in their 20s and 30s attracted by high-profile advertising campaigns and – in part – the excellent BBC drama Spooks.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Spy Base: For The "Greater Good"?

Are these the faces of urban terrorists or social freedom fighters?Three activists, who breached the Waihopai spy base, Blenheim in 2008 and slashed a plastic weather cover on a satellite dish, have walked free.
Their defence? They were driven by a belief that the satellite caused human suffering and so their actions to shut it down were lawful. This has been successfully used by Iraq-war protesters overseas, but is a New Zealand first. In acquitting them, the jury would have considered whether the men genuinely believed their actions would save lives and, if so, whether the force they used was reasonable.
What am I missing here? They admitted wilful trespass and NZ$1-million damage to government property... but they're free because they believed their actions would save people and so were lawful!
Let's follow that "logic". I currently drive an old car (borderline road-safe)... so could I legally steal a Volvo car because it has a great safety record and would therefore be for "the greater good" of my family?
Then there're those who claim NZ gains nothing from supporting the US with this spy base. Well, we don't know WHAT information is being gleaned. We'll NEVER be told if information from this spy base has averted threats in the Asia/Pacific region – or if lives were lost BECAUSE of it. That's the very nature of spying: it's clandestine – and for the most part, it serves "the greater good" of the community.
So which example of servitude provides more benefit? Temporarily closing a spy base because of a self-righteous belief...or maintaining surveillance over a volatile region on our back doorstep?
Which is the greater "greater good"?
PS: 31 Aug.2011 - FINALLY! The High Court has awarded the Crown the right to sue these three idiots for damages to the tune of $1.2m!

Friday, February 26, 2010

How Many Does It Take...?

Q: How many psychiatrists does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: One, but the lightbulb must want to change.
Q: How many assassins does it take to kill one man?
A: Supposedly, 30...and still climbing!
According to investigators, 26 agents (now possibly 30) of an as-yet unidentified country (but they're accusing Israel) murdered senior Hamas commander, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in Dubai in January.
Their expertly-forged passports used the identities of innocent civilians from multiple countries. More details are slowly being released by the Dubai Information Ministry, each taking us further into the realms of 007. For instance, in the first 10 days after Mabhouh's death, Dubai police thought he'd died of natural causes. Then smothered with a pillow. Next, brute force. Then tortured and tied up with wire. Clearly the evidence cannot support all these claims. We've seen CCTV footage showing bad disguises the suspects used. Now we're told some suspects fled through Iran: if these were Israeli Mossad agents, surely it would be suicidal for them to attempt an escape through the country of their sworn enemy...? Oh yes, and fingerprints have suddenly been found - a month later!
No doubt some of this information is mere fish bait, in the hope someone (in Israel?) will swallow it and incriminate himself by responding or disclosing confidential information... but currently the evidence linking Israel to the killing has still to solidify. And indeed, if Israel did carry out the killing (seeing as it's at war with Hamas), did it have the right to? Whatever the eventual outcome, this assassination should start Hamas asking the question:
Q: When will someone hit another of our top echelon?
A: Anytime they want...